Colorado employers could be prohibited from denying employment to or firing staff due to their off-the-clock hashish use – both medical or leisure – below a measure launched final week on the statehouse.
House Bill 1152 would additionally require employers to let their staff devour medical marijuana whereas on the job. The laws would come with exceptions for staff whose jobs are in harmful fields or require superb motor abilities, corresponding to positions involving using heavy equipment.
“Marijuana is authorized in Colorado,” stated state Rep. Brianna Titone, an Arvada Democrat and prime sponsor of the invoice. “And what individuals do of their spare time that doesn’t affect their work shouldn’t actually be an issue for them. They need to have the ability to benefit from the authorized issues that we now have right here in Colorado and never be penalized for it.”
The invoice seeks to reply a office query that has been swirling in Colorado since voters handed Modification 64 in 2012, legalizing the sale and use of leisure hashish. Most states which have legalized medicinal and leisure pot go away the query over methods to deal with workers’ marijuana use as much as employers, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Nevada and New Jersey are two exceptions. In New Jersey, employers can prohibit workers from utilizing hashish whereas on the job or displaying as much as work impaired. However they don’t seem to be allowed to penalize an worker solely due to their off-the-clock leisure hashish use.
Sign up here to get The Unaffiliated, our twice-weekly e-newsletter on Colorado politics and coverage.
Every version if full of unique information, evaluation and different behind-the-scenes info you gained’t discover wherever else. Subscribe at this time to see what all the excitement is about.
In 2015, the Colorado Supreme Courtroom sided with an employer, Dish Community, who fired an worker, Brandon Coats, who examined optimistic for tetrahydrocannabinol – or THC – in a random drug check. Coats had a medical marijuana card on account of again spasms brought on by his quadriplegia. Muscle spasms is among the seven debilitating conditions for which medical marijuana may be really helpful below Colorado regulation.
The intently watched case highlighted a contradiction inside Colorado’s stance on pot: marijuana could also be authorized in Colorado, however utilizing it will probably nonetheless be grounds for termination.
Titone and her co-prime sponsor of the invoice, Rep. Edie Hooton, D-Boulder, assume that shouldn’t be the case.
“The entire concept is to sign to the enterprise group and to employers that as a result of we now have legalized hashish we must be following the identical legal guidelines and guidelines that apply to alcohol and prescribed drugs,” Hooton stated.
She additionally identified that medical marijuana usually comes within the type of a CBD product, not a THC product.
The laws was launched on Friday and Hooton stated she continues to be speaking to the enterprise and labor communities about it. Main opposition hasn’t cropped up but, nevertheless it’s probably that employers who’ve drug-free office insurance policies will push again on the measure. A similar bill was rejected in 2020.
“The Nationwide Federal of Impartial Companies has traditionally opposed any laws that will (permit) using marijuana on the property of the employer or trigger an worker to check optimistic for any prohibited drug or prohibit any authority of the employer to carry out random drug exams,” stated Tony Gagliardi, who leads the Colorado chapter of the group. “Marijuana stays unlawful below federal regulation.”
The Colorado Chamber of Commerce stated it hasn’t taken a proper place on Home Invoice 1152, however that it’s opposed comparable laws up to now.
Titone plans to pitch the measure as a approach for employers to extra simply discover staff in Colorado’s tight labor market.
However Home Minority Chief Chris Holbert, R-Douglas County, expressed early opposition to the idea. He has labored on quite a lot of measures increasing medical marijuana entry.
Holbert identified that Modification 64 included the next provision: “Nothing on this (poll measure) is meant to require an employer to allow or accommodate the use, consumption, possession, switch, delay, transportation, sale or rising of marijuana within the office to to have an effect on the power of employers to have insurance policies restriction using marijuana by workers.”
“That basically did make clear that employers can have a 100% drug-free coverage of their office, and that, for my part, shouldn’t be infringed upon,” he stated.
(Modification 20, the 2000 poll initiative permitting medical marijuana gross sales and use in Colorado, included a provision about the way it doesn’t “require any employer to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any office.”)
Holbert stated he would encourage employers in Colorado, nevertheless, to know the distinction between drug exams that may inform if somebody has activated THC – which might point out if somebody is actively excessive – of their system or simply traces of the substance.
Colorado has a 5 ng/ml THC blood restrict for drivers. Folks charged with a marijuana DUI in Colorado can argue that they weren’t impaired through the time of the alleged offense and that the THC of their bloodstream displays prior or frequent consumption.
Home Invoice 1152 has but to be scheduled for its first committee listening to.